Foster v. Housing Authority of Columbus

245 S.E.2d 349, 146 Ga. App. 12, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2182
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1978
Docket55478
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 245 S.E.2d 349 (Foster v. Housing Authority of Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Housing Authority of Columbus, 245 S.E.2d 349, 146 Ga. App. 12, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

*12 McMurray, Judge.

This is a dispossessory proceeding brought by the Housing Authority of Columbus, Georgia against a tenant, Sherryl Foster, for the nonpayment of rent, seeking possession of the premises after the owner has made a demand and the same has been refused. The tenant answered pro se denying that she owed any rent and asked "for a trial by jury.”

A jury trial was held, and at the conclusion of defendant’s case plaintiff moved for directed verdict which was granted by the court. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff was then entered for possession of the premises. Defendant appeals stating that a transcript of proceedings would not be filed for inclusion in the record. Held:

Defendant seeks to set out by brief in narrative form the evidence adduced at the trial, the same being certain exhibits which are found in the record. However, we do not have a transcript of the evidence and where there is no transcript this court is bound to assume that the trial judge’s findings are supported by competent evidence. Simmons v. Chambliss, 128 Ga. App. 218, 219 (196 SE2d 183); Johnson v. Scott, 141 Ga. App. 645 (234 SE2d 184); Sherron v. Craddock, 133 Ga. App. 926 (213 SE2d 62); Nicholson v. Nicholson, 231 Ga. 760 (204 SE2d 292); Dunaway v. Beam, 129 Ga. App. 220, 221 (199 SE2d 395). Since the only enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict which requires consideration of the evidence, and there is no transcript, we find no merit in the complaint.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aprea v. Cobb
535 S.E.2d 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Young v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF GEORGIA, NA
396 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Tidwell Homes, Inc. v. Sharif
297 S.E.2d 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Burleson v. Jordan
295 S.E.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Colvin v. United States
267 S.E.2d 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Littlejohn v. J. A. Cavaness Steel Erectors, Inc.
257 S.E.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.E.2d 349, 146 Ga. App. 12, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-housing-authority-of-columbus-gactapp-1978.