Foster v. Hightower
40 Ala. 295
Opinion
It does not appear that the defendant excepted to the charge of the court. The words at the conclusion, “ and this is signed and sealed as plaintiff’s.bill of exceptions,” are not equivalent to an exception, though we might infer that the word “plaintiff’s” is a clerical mistake for “ defendant’s.” On the authority of Milton v. Rowland, (11 Ala. 732,) Mahoney v. O’Leary, (34 Ala. 97,) and other cases decided by this court, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. Hightower, 40 Ala. 295 (Ala. 1866).
40 Ala. 295 (Foster v. Hightower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milton v. Rowland
11 Ala. 732 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
Mahoney v. O'Leary
34 Ala. 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)