Foster v. Harrison

3 Ala. 25
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ala. 25 (Foster v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Harrison, 3 Ala. 25 (Ala. 1841).

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

1. There is no question but that, according to the course of practice in this State, judgments such as this, must show every fact affirmatively in the judgment entry that is necessary to sustain the summary jurisdiction exercised by the court.

2. It -is equally clear that the recitals of the judgment con[26]*26form to this view with the utmost precision and correctness. The legal presumtion arises, that both defendants were named as parties in the writ of error, when the clerk certifies that one of them prayed for and obtained the writ; because on such case-alone, is the clerk authorised to issue it, or to supersede the judgment.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

-o-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ala. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-harrison-ala-1841.