Foster v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Foster v. Foster

916 P.2d 886, 141 Or. App. 128, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 689

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 15, 1996

Docket95-421-MC; CA A90928

StatusPublished

This text of 916 P.2d 886 (Foster v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. Foster, 916 P.2d 886, 141 Or. App. 128, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 689 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.005 et seq. She argues that there was not sufficient evidence from which the court could find that she was mentally ill under ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A)-(C). The state agrees that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant meets any of the criteria for civil commitment. On our de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.005 et seq. She argues that there was not sufficient evidence from which the court could find that she was mentally ill under ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A)-(C). The state agrees that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant meets any of the criteria for civil commitment. On our de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

916 P.2d 886, 141 Or. App. 128, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-foster-orctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack