Foster v. Foster

916 P.2d 886, 141 Or. App. 128, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 689
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 15, 1996·No. 95-421-MC; CA A90928·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.005 et seq. She argues that there was not sufficient evidence from which the court could find that she was mentally ill under ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A)-(C). The state agrees that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant meets any of the criteria for civil commitment. On our de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Foster, 916 P.2d 886, 141 Or. App. 128, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 689 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

916 P.2d 886 (Foster v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Neill v. O'Neill
545 P.2d 97 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)