Foster v. Foster

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Foster v. Foster

262 So. 2d 98, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6602

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster v. Foster. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 So. 2d 70 →

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 10, 1972·No. No. 3818·Published

Opinion

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a suit for separation from bed and board brought by Joan Foster, the wife, by original petition and brought by Leroy Foster on his behalf by reconventional demand.

The trial judge rejected both demands for a separation after concluding that the evidence indicated that both parties were equally responsible for the difficulty and neither was oppressed enough to merit an award of a separation. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence and find no manifest error.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a suit for separation from bed and board brought by Joan Foster, the wife, by original petition and brought by Leroy Foster on his behalf by reconventional demand.

The trial judge rejected both demands for a separation after concluding that the evidence indicated that both parties were equally responsible for the difficulty and neither was oppressed enough to merit an award of a separation. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence and find no manifest error.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Foster v. Foster, 262 So. 2d 98, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6602 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

262 So. 2d 98 (Foster v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.