Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
88 A. 474, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 67
This text of 88 A. 474 (Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co., 88 A. 474, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 67 (Me. 1913).
Opinion
On motion to set aside a verdict of a jury. The evidence was conflicting. Although we might have decided the question of fact differently from the way the jury did, we cannot say that the jury were not warranted in believing the plaintiff’s version, and in returning a verdict for him. Motion for a new trial overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boisvert v. Charest
193 A. 841 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 A. 474, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-eastern-trust-banking-co-me-1913.