Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.

88 A. 474, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 67
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 11, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On motion to set aside a verdict of a jury. The evidence was conflicting. Although we might have decided the question of fact differently from the way the jury did, we cannot say that the jury were not warranted in believing the plaintiff’s version, and in returning a verdict for him. Motion for a new trial overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co., 88 A. 474, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 67 (Me. 1913).

88 A. 474 (Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boisvert v. Charest
193 A. 841 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)