Foster v. Commissioner

1973 T.C. Memo. 14, 32 T.C.M. 48, 1973 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 T.C.M. 913
United States Tax Court·Decided January 23, 1973·No. Docket No. 165-71.·Unpublished

Opinion

REX B. FOSTER, JR., AND BARBARA FOSTER, Petitioners v COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Foster v. Commissioner
Docket No. 165-71.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1973-14; 1973 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 272; 32 T.C.M. (CCH) 48; T.C.M. (RIA) 73014;
January 23, 1973, Filed

*272 HELD: Despite large losses suffered during the years in issue and subsequent years, petitioners were engaged in the business of raising and breeding Tennessee Walking Horses during the five years in issue because these years were the formative years of the business and because petitioners evidenced an intent to make a profit from the sale of foals in the future.

Marion Hirschburg, for the petitioners.
Robert J. Murray, for the respondent.

IRWIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

IRWIN,

Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioners' income taxes:

YearDeficiency
1964$7,181.35
196520,174.27
19669,952.83
196721,626.12
*273 2

We must decide whether petitioners were engaged in the business of breeding and raising Tennessee Walking Horses (hereafter "walkers") during the years in question and were entitled to deduct from other income the losses incurred from such operation. If we decide that petitioners were not so engaged, we must then determine whether respondent has the right to readjust petitioners' base period income for the taxable years 1962 and 1963 for the purpose of computing their averageable income for the taxable years 1964, 1965 and 1967, even though assessment and collection of the additional tax liabilities determined for 1962 and 1963 are barred by the statute of limitations set forth in section 6501 of the Code. 1 In any event, because of certain concessions made by the parties, a computation under Rule 50 will be required.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The petitioners are husband and wife who at the time their petition was filed resided in Waterloo, Iowa. They filed their joint Federal income tax returns for the years 1964 through 1967, inclusive, with the district director of internal revenue*274 in Des Moines, Iowa.

Rex B. Foster, Jr. (hereafter Dr. Foster) is a dental surgeon. His wife, petitioner Barbara Foster, is a 3 graduate of Northwestern University.During the taxable years petitioners had three dependent children, daughters Teresa and Jennifer, and son Rex III.

During the taxable years Dr. Foster practiced oral surgery in Waterloo as a member of the partnership known as Foster and Foster. Also, during these years, petitioners lived at Rangemore Farms, Walking Horse Division, R.R. #4, Waterloo, Iowa.

Petitioners reported gross operating receipts from their horse raising activities, net operating losses from such activities, and partnership income from Dr. Foster's oral surgery practice on their income tax returns for the years 1963 through 1970 in the following amounts:

Schedule C B. Foster, Jr.'s
GrossDistributable
YearGross ReceiptsExpensesNet LossesRex B. Foster, Jr.'s Distributable Share Of Partnership Income
1963$915.00$9,410.38$8,495.38$ 28,217.28
19641,196.0017,989.2516,793.2545,280.61
1965810.5017,702.1417,091.6448,241.15(a)
1966558 .0019,332.2718,774.2745,197.15(a)
19671,820.98(b)14,697.5812,876.6057,998.14(a)
19682,193.0318,564.03 16,371.0075,505.13
1969886.4417,887.8317,001.3971,608.55
19701,908.1616,966.2815,058.1265,380.16
$10,288.11

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Commissioner, 1973 T.C. Memo. 14, 32 T.C.M. 48, 1973 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 272 (tax 1973).

1973 T.C. Memo. 14 (Foster v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Eisner
282 F. 38 (Second Circuit, 1922)