Foster v. Cole

Fourth Circuit

Foster v. Cole

353 F. App'x 833

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2009·No. No. 09-7375·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Foster v. Cole, No. 3:09-cv-00452-PMD, 2009 WL 1923382 (D.S.C. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Foster v. Cole, No. 3:09-cv-00452-PMD, 2009 WL 1923382 (D.S.C. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Foster v. Cole, 353 F. App'x 833 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

353 F. App'x 833 (Foster v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related