Foster v. Cleveland
10 Barb. 299
This text of 10 Barb. 299 (Foster v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Foster v. Cleveland, 10 Barb. 299 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).
Opinion
The testimony in this cause was the same as in the preceding, except that in this it was proved positively that the warrant and rate-bill were in fact signed, at the time they were made out on the 12th or 14th of March, which was more than 30 days before they were delivered to the officer.
The judgment of the county court of St. Lawrence county was reversed, and that of the justice affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Barb. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-cleveland-nysupct-1851.