Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department

Fourth Circuit

Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department

42 F. App'x 595

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 31, 2002

DocketNo. 02-1617

StatusPublished

This text of 42 F. App'x 595 (Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department, 42 F. App'x 595 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard E. Foster appeals the district court’s order dismissing individual defendants from his employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not ap-pealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard E. Foster appeals the district court’s order dismissing individual defendants from his employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not ap-pealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 F. App'x 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-city-of-greenville-fire-department-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack