Foster v. City of Boston

102 N.E. 359, 215 Mass. 31, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1244
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 24, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Loring, J.

These are four petitions for the abatement of taxes like those brought in Williams v. Milton, ante, 1. These are brought by the trustees under a deed of trust called the General Investment Trust. The decision in Williams v. Milton is decisive of the true character of the General Investment Trust. It is a trust and the cestuis que trust are not partners. It follows that the plaintiffs 'are entitled to an abatement in the [32] petition against the city of Boston, but not in the other petitions.

J. E. Searle, for the plaintiffs. W. P. Higgins & R. M. Walsh, for the city of Boston, submitted brief. W. H. White, for the town of Brookline, F. Rackemann, for the town of Milton. W. G. Rowe, for the town of Westwood.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. City of Boston, 102 N.E. 359, 215 Mass. 31, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1244 (Mass. 1913).

102 N.E. 359 (Foster v. City of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betts v. Hackathorn
252 S.W. 602 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1923)
State v. Cosgrove
210 P. 393 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)
Rice v. Bennington County Savings Bank
108 A. 708 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1920)