Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

255 P. 1118, 201 Cal. 769, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 523
California Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1927·No. Docket No. S.F. 12342.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Application for a writ of mandate to compel the City Council and other officials of the City of Berkeley to reconsider a certain ordinance relating to the rezoning of a certain restricted district within said city, and to either repeal the ordinance or submit the same to a *Page 770 referendum vote of the electors of the city at the next general election or at a special election to be called for such purpose. This proceeding differs in none of its essential aspects from the proceeding entitled Dwyer v. City Council of the City ofBerkeley, etc., 200 Cal. 505 [253 P. 932].

Upon the authority of that decision it is, therefore, ordered that the writ issue as prayed for herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley, 255 P. 1118, 201 Cal. 769, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 523 (Cal. 1927).

255 P. 1118 (Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlton v. Hezmalhalch
89 P.2d 1109 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)