Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

255 P. 1118, 201 Cal. 769, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 523
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1927
DocketDocket No. S.F. 12342.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 P. 1118 (Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley, 255 P. 1118, 201 Cal. 769, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 523 (Cal. 1927).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Application for a writ of mandate to compel the City Council and other officials of the City of Berkeley to reconsider a certain ordinance relating to the rezoning of a certain restricted district within said city, and to either repeal the ordinance or submit the same to a *Page 770 referendum vote of the electors of the city at the next general election or at a special election to be called for such purpose. This proceeding differs in none of its essential aspects from the proceeding entitled Dwyer v. City Council of the City ofBerkeley, etc., 200 Cal. 505 [253 P. 932].

Upon the authority of that decision it is, therefore, ordered that the writ issue as prayed for herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knowlton v. Hezmalhalch
89 P.2d 1109 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 P. 1118, 201 Cal. 769, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-city-council-of-the-city-of-berkeley-cal-1927.