Foster v. Burton, Judge

232 P. 917, 64 Utah 550, 1924 Utah LEXIS 68
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 26, 1924
DocketNo. 4225.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 232 P. 917 (Foster v. Burton, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Burton, Judge, 232 P. 917, 64 Utah 550, 1924 Utah LEXIS 68 (Utah 1924).

Opinion

FRICK, J.

This is. a companion case to the case of Higgins v. Burton, just decided, 64 Utah —, 232 P. 914. The facts are the same in this case as in that one.

Upon the authority of that case, therefore, it is ordered that a, peremptory writ of mandate issue forthwith, requiring the said district courts and the Hon. Thomas H. Burton as judge thereof to permit the plaintiff to appear and practice before said courts and such judge, and that he be restored to all of his rights and privileges as an attorney and counselor at law in accordance with the certificate issued to him by this court. Neither party to recover costs.

WEBEE, C. J., and GIDEON, THUEMAN, and CHEEEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Laramie v. Mengel
671 P.2d 340 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1983)
Boggess v. Morris
635 P.2d 39 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Burton
246 P. 188 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 P. 917, 64 Utah 550, 1924 Utah LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-burton-judge-utah-1924.