Foster v. Burnley

192 S.E. 389, 56 Ga. App. 202, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 318
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1937
Docket26040
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 192 S.E. 389 (Foster v. Burnley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Burnley, 192 S.E. 389, 56 Ga. App. 202, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 318 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Several excerpts from tlie charge of the court are complained of in the motion for new trial. While some of these detached fragments of the charge, if treated alone, are subject to slight criticism, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, and the facts of the case, none of them discloses reversible error.

2. The verdict in favor of tlie defendant was amply authorized by the evidence. All of the special assignments of error are based on certain excerpts from the charge of the court, and are without substantial merit. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre mid Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Castle
117 S.E.2d 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Pollard v. Kent
200 S.E. 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E. 389, 56 Ga. App. 202, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-burnley-gactapp-1937.