Foster v. Bartlett

62 N.H. 617
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*618 Carpenter, J.

The plaintiff had his election to bring an action on the contract to recover damages for the breach of it, or to treat it as rescinded and recover the money as received to his use. Stevens v. Cushing, 1 N. H. 18; Drew v. Claggett, 39 N. H. 431, 433. The defendant’s payment of $200 affords no objection to the plaintiff’s pursuing the last named course. The defendant is not injured by the rescisión. Notwithstanding his partial performance of his agreement, he is restored to the situation he occupied before the contract was made. Luey v. Bundy, 9 N. H. 298, 302, 303; King v. Hutchins, 28 N. H. 561, 573.

Judgment on the verdict.

Stanley. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Bartlett, 62 N.H. 617 (N.H. 1883).

62 N.H. 617 (Foster v. Bartlett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dow v. Harkin
29 A. 846 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1892)