Foster v. 163rd Street Realty, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Foster v. 163rd Street Realty, Inc.

169 So. 2d 359

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1964

DocketNo. 64-134

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 2d 359 (Foster v. 163rd Street Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. 163rd Street Realty, Inc., 169 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellees sued for and recovered a real estate commission. The case was tried before a jury in the civil court of record in Dade County. This appeal by the defendants presents five points. Three of them deal with rulings by the court during the trial which were discretionary, and as to which no abuse of discretion was shown.

There was adequate support in the evidence for the conclusion reached by the jury that under the applicable law the performance by the brokers was sufficient for recovery. See O’Bryan v. Linton, Fla.1949, 41 So.2d 169.

A final point, as to the costs included in the judgment, has been considered and found to be without merit.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from should be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI