Foster, Son & Harlan v. Whitten

91 S.E. 918, 19 Ga. App. 549, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 231
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 20, 1917
Docket7998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 918 (Foster, Son & Harlan v. Whitten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster, Son & Harlan v. Whitten, 91 S.E. 918, 19 Ga. App. 549, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 231 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

1. A suit upon a promissory note under seal, dated February 9, 1891, and due one day after date, was commenced July 30, 1915. The plaintiff alleged, that “while the note, the foundation of the suit, shows on its face to be barred by the statute of limitations, it in fact is not barred; that for a number of years following the signing of the note defendant resided out of the State of Georgia; that for twelve or thirteen years since said note was signed defendant has been incarcerated in the Georgia Penitentiary, being legally dead, and for the remainder of the time has been beyond the limits of the State.” Held, that there was no error in striking the allegation that “for twelve or thirteen years since said note was signed defendant has been incarcerated in the Georgia Penitentiary, being legally dead.” The criminal act of the defendant, followed by his legal imprisonment, did not postpone the plaintiff’s right to commence and prosecute his suit upon the note. The plaintiff was himself unfettered and could have sued, and the proper venue for the suit remained in the county of .the defendant’s residence at the time of his arrest and conviction.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court to which exceptions are taken [550]*550are not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned, and the evidence warranted the verdict.

Decided March 20, 1917. Complaint—appeal; from Whitfield, superior court—Judge Fite. November 27, 1916. G. W. Head, W. H. Mann, for plaintiffs. George G. Glenn, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddox v. Hall County
291 S.E.2d 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Heard v. Caldwell
364 F. Supp. 419 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
Hardin v. Dodd
167 S.E. 277 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 918, 19 Ga. App. 549, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-son-harlan-v-whitten-gactapp-1917.