Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co.

E.D. California

Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 19, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-01628·Unknown

Opinion

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, No. 1:20-cv-01628-NODJ-SKO

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND INSURANCE COMPANY, (Doc. 28) Defendant. On December 14, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 28.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter close this case.

Dated: December 18, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, No. 1:20-cv-01628-NODJ-SKO

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND INSURANCE COMPANY, (Doc. 28) Defendant. On December 14, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 28.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter close this case.

Dated: December 18, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co. (Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related