Foster Poultry Farms v. Contractors Bonding and Ins. Co.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, No. 1:20-cv-01628-NODJ-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND 14 CONTRACTORS BONDING AND CLOSE THE CASE INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 (Doc. 28) 16 Defendant. 17 18 On December 14, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 28.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge 22 to this matter and thereafter close this case. 23

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: December 18, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28