Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 F.3d 1
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 8, 2000·No. 99-1228·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1227

FOSTER-MILLER, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

BABCOCK & WILCOX CANADA, Defendant, Appellant,

No. 99-1228

FOSTER-MILLER, INC. Plaintiff, Appellant,

BABCOCK & WILCOX CANADA, Defendant, Appellee.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on March 31, 2000 is amended as follows:

Page 15, line 5: delete "between" and replace it with "among"

Page 15, lines 20-23: delete "United States v. Zanghi, 189 F.3d 71, 79-80 (1st Cir. 1999) (evidentiary sufficiency is measured against instructions to which no objection has been lodged, at least where such instructions are not "patently incorrect"), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 839 (2000)" Page 15, line 24: delete "(similar)" and replace it with "(noting that the law of the case doctrine, although not totally rigid, presumptively applies in circumstances such as these); Scott- Harris v. City of Fall River, 134 F.3d 427, 442 & n.16 (1st Cir. 1997) (similar, citing two other civil cases), reversed on other grounds, 523 U.S. 44 (1998)."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox, (1st Cir. 2000).

Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox (Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogan v. Scott-Harris
523 U.S. 44 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Zanghi
189 F.3d 71 (First Circuit, 1999)