Foster, Latarus Waymond

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 2011
DocketWR-75,856-01
StatusPublished

This text of Foster, Latarus Waymond (Foster, Latarus Waymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster, Latarus Waymond, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-75,856-01
EX PARTE LATARUS WAYMOND FOSTER, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 17322B IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to forty-five years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his guilty plea was rendered involuntary by trial counsel's failure to investigate the facts of his case, prepare for trial, and develop a defense strategy. Applicant also contends that counsel led him to believe that a white jury would automatically find him guilty and that if he went to trial he would not be able to appeal his conviction. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel rendered Applicant's guilty plea involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. The plea papers and the reporter's record of the plea, if it exists, shall also be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: June 8, 2011

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Foster, Latarus Waymond, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-latarus-waymond-texcrimapp-2011.