Foster, Darwin Bernard
This text of Foster, Darwin Bernard (Foster, Darwin Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,665-01
EX PARTE DARWIN FOSTER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1499428 IN THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of child and sentenced to life years’
imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Foster v. State, No. 01-18-
00006-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st] April 11, 2019)(not designated for publication). Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective. Applicant has
alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court has ordered trial counsel to 2
respond. We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and
make findings of fact and conclusions of law.
In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 26, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Foster, Darwin Bernard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-darwin-bernard-texcrimapp-2021.