Foster Brown v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2018·No. 18-1855·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-1855

FOSTER BROWN, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

August 16, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Petitioner is cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Foster Brown, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster Brown v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Foster Brown v. State of Florida (Foster Brown v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)