Fossum v. State Accident Insurance Fund

624 P.2d 1074, 290 Or. 267, 1980 Ore. LEXIS 1291
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1980·No. CA 14961, SC 26965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TONGUE, J.

Respondent SAIF petitions for rehearing of our decision in Fossum v. SAIF, 289 Or 787, 619 P2d 233 (1980), contending that our opinion failed to address all issues necessary for a proper disposition of the case. We deny rehearing but amend the last paragraph of the opinion to read as follows:

"For these reasons, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of plaintiff’s claim on its merits.”

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fossum v. State Accident Insurance Fund, 624 P.2d 1074, 290 Or. 267, 1980 Ore. LEXIS 1291 (Or. 1980).

624 P.2d 1074 (Fossum v. State Accident Insurance Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buchanan v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
908 P.2d 242 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1995)