Fossett v. State

1913 OK CR 361, 135 P. 1192, 10 Okla. Crim. 659, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 15, 1913·No. No. A-1833.·Published

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county upon an information which charged the unlawful possession of twenty-eight pints of whisky and seventeen bottles of beer. On the 19th day of July, 1912, in accordance with the verdict of the jury she was sentenced to. be confined in the county jail for six months and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. After a careful examination of the various questions raised, we are satisfied that under well settled rules, sustained and upheld by the decisions of' this court,' no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant was committed on the trial, nor have we any reason to doubt that the verdict was reached only upon a fair and full consideration of the case by the jury. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fossett v. State, 1913 OK CR 361, 135 P. 1192, 10 Okla. Crim. 659, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

1913 OK CR 361 (Fossett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.