Fosselman's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fosselman's Appeal

2 Pennyp. 238

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 2, 1882

DocketNo. 97

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Pennyp. 238 (Fosselman's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fosselman's Appeal, 2 Pennyp. 238 (Pa. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

The original appraisement did not decide against the liability of the appellant to collateral inheritance tax as respects the alleged gift or assignment for value, but suspended a decision because the matter was in dispute. When it was afterwards settled that the [241]*241gift or assignment was a testament, he then decided that it was subject to the tax. The limitation only began to run from the last date.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam:

The original appraisement did not decide against the liability of the appellant to collateral inheritance tax as respects the alleged gift or assignment for value, but suspended a decision because the matter was in dispute. When it was afterwards settled that the [241]*241gift or assignment was a testament, he then decided that it was subject to the tax. The limitation only began to run from the last date.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pennyp. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fosselmans-appeal-pa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack