Fosselman's Appeal

2 Pennyp. 238
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 2, 1882·No. No. 97·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

The original appraisement did not decide against the liability of the appellant to collateral inheritance tax as respects the alleged gift or assignment for value, but suspended a decision because the matter was in dispute. When it was afterwards settled that the [241] gift or assignment was a testament, he then decided that it was subject to the tax. The limitation only began to run from the last date.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fosselman's Appeal, 2 Pennyp. 238 (Pa. 1882).

2 Pennyp. 238 (Fosselman's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Moneypenny
37 A. 589 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)