Foskey v. State
838 So. 2d 1246, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3087, 2003 WL 1027797
Opinion
Ruby Foskey appeals from an order requiring her to pay $524.70 in restitution. Foskey argues that the order must be reversed because she was not represented by counsel at the restitution hearing. The State concedes that Foskey was entitled to have counsel present during the restitution hearing. We agree. See Moment v. State, 645 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new evidentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foskey v. State, 838 So. 2d 1246, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3087, 2003 WL 1027797 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
838 So. 2d 1246 (Foskey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moment v. State
645 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)