Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Foskey v. Foskey

Foskey v. Foskey

784 So. 2d 619, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2001 WL 530485
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 21, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-3440
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 784 So. 2d 619 (Foskey v. Foskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foskey v. Foskey, 784 So. 2d 619, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2001 WL 530485 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we conclude that (1) the trial court’s findings of fact are- supported by competent substantial evidence; (2) there is no error of law which requires reversal; and (3) given the most unusual facts of this case, we are unable to say that the trial court abused its discretion in any way. Accordingly, the supplemental final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cavallaro v. Stratford Homes, Inc.
784 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 So. 2d 619, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2001 WL 530485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foskey-v-foskey-fladistctapp-2001.