Foskey v. Foskey
784 So. 2d 619, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2001 WL 530485
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2001·No. No. 1D00-3440·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we conclude that (1) the trial court’s findings of fact are- supported by competent substantial evidence; (2) there is no error of law which requires reversal; and (3) given the most unusual facts of this case, we are unable to say that the trial court abused its discretion in any way. Accordingly, the supplemental final judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foskey v. Foskey, 784 So. 2d 619, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2001 WL 530485 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
784 So. 2d 619 (Foskey v. Foskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cavallaro v. Stratford Homes, Inc.
784 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)