Fosgate v. Strelecki

247 A.2d 881, 53 N.J. 55, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 25, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 435 (App. Div. 1968).

For affirmance —■ Chief Justice Weirtraub and Justices Jacobs, Erarcis, Proctor, Hall, Schettiro and Hare-mar — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fosgate v. Strelecki, 247 A.2d 881, 53 N.J. 55, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 206 (N.J. 1968).

247 A.2d 881 (Fosgate v. Strelecki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles v. Egan
511 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1986)