Forzaglia v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedSeptember 12, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-00273
StatusUnknown

This text of Forzaglia v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo (Forzaglia v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forzaglia v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, (D.N.M. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

PHILIP FORZAGLIA,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 23-cv-273-WJ-KRS

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF BERNALILLO, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Philip Forzaglia’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 6 at 24-28) (the “IFP Motion”). Plaintiff was incarcerated when he initiated this prisoner civil rights case. Although he appears to have been released from custody, the Prison Litigation Reform Act continues to apply. See Carson v. Tulsa Police Dep't, 266 F. App’x 763, 766 (10th Cir.2008) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), applies “to a plaintiff . . . who was in prison at the time of filing notice of the appeal, but has since been released.”). Plaintiff’s financial information reflects he is unable to prepay the $402 filing fee for his prisoner civil rights complaint. The Court will therefore grant Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which reduces the fee to $350, and allow Plaintiff to pay in installments. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Plaintiff must make an initial partial payment of “20 percent of the greater of …[his] average monthly deposits … or (B) the average monthly balance” for the six-month period immediately preceding this action. Id. Plaintiff receives an average of $61.33 per month, and his average monthly balance is $23.02. (Doc. 6 at 26-28). The Court will assess an initial payment of $12.27, which is 20% of the greater figure ($61.33), pursuant to § 1915(b)(1)(A). After payment of the initial partial fee, Plaintiff is “required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). If Plaintiff fails to timely make the initial partial payment, his complaint may be dismissed without further notice. IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The IFP Motion (6 at 24-28) is GRANTED. (2) Within thirty (30) days from entry of this order, Plaintiff shall send to the Clerk an initial partial payment of $12.27. (3) The Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with two copies of this order, and Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements to attach one copy of this order to the check in the amount of the initial partial payment. (4) After payment of the initial partial fee, Plaintiff make monthly payments of twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to his account or show cause why the designated payments should be excused.

Te □□□

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carson v. Tulsa Police Department
266 F. App'x 763 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Forzaglia v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forzaglia-v-the-board-of-county-commissioners-of-the-county-of-bernalillo-nmd-2023.