Forward v. Gernert
This text of 287 F. Supp. 680 (Forward v. Gernert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Richard Forward has applied to this Court for injunctive relief against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. He claims that the Board has erroneously and arbitrarily computed the sentence which he is now serving.
We do not believe that Forward’s application has raised any questions of constitutional proportion. Thus he cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-3, or under any habeas corpus theory of relief. His application to proceed in forma pauperis must be denied.
Additionally, a letter to the Court from the Board of Probation and Parole explaining the computation of Forward’s sentence appears to indicate that Forward simply misunderstands the basis of his sentence. A copy of this letter is attached to this memorandum and will be forwarded to applicant Forward.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 F. Supp. 680, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forward-v-gernert-paed-1968.