Fortune v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Fortune v. State

1921 OK CR 146, 200 P. 265, 19 Okla. Crim. 300, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 30, 1921

DocketNo. A-3725.

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 146 (Fortune v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fortune v. State, 1921 OK CR 146, 200 P. 265, 19 Okla. Crim. 300, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jim Fortune was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county upon a charge that he did have possession of certain intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the county jail for 60 days and a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on March 11, 1920, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated the motion to -affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jim Fortune was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county upon a charge that he did have possession of certain intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the county jail for 60 days and a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on March 11, 1920, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated the motion to -affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK CR 146, 200 P. 265, 19 Okla. Crim. 300, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortune-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.