Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT

948 A.2d 805, 597 Pa. 707
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 28, 2008·No. 33 WAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CERISSA R. FORTUNE, Respondent
v.
LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM J. MANCINO, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS DIRECTOR OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; AMY STROBEL, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS OFFICE MANAGER OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; AND CRYSTAL SCHILLING, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, Petitioners.

No. 33 WAL 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

April 28, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of April 2008, the Motion for Leave to File Reply to Brief in Opposition is denied. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, 948 A.2d 805, 597 Pa. 707 (Pa. 2008).

948 A.2d 805 (Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related