Fortune v. Gilbert

69 N.E. 857, 207 Ill. 235
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 69 N.E. 857 (Fortune v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fortune v. Gilbert, 69 N.E. 857, 207 Ill. 235 (Ill. 1904).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Ricks

delivered the opinion of the court:

The motion to dismiss the appeal will be allowed. The right of appeal is a statutory right, and can only be availed of when allowed by the court, and must then be in conformity to the prayer for appeal and the order of allowance. Here the appeal was prayed and granted to three of the parties jointly and perfected by only one of them. It is not in compliance with the prayer or order of appeal. (Carson v. Merle, 3 Scam. 168; Hileman v. Beale, 115 Ill. 355; Ellison v. Hammond, 189 id. 470; Tedrick v. Wells, 152 id. 214; Town v. Howieson, 175 id. 85.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnston v. Geary
33 P.2d 757 (Utah Supreme Court, 1934)
City of Momence v. Kirby
146 N.E. 142 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1924)
West Disinfecting Co. v. Koppelman
216 Ill. App. 456 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Bieber v. Thoma
186 Ill. App. 83 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Hopper v. Connelly
178 Ill. App. 119 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)
Huehl v. Funke
160 Ill. App. 71 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Kissack v. Bourke
132 Ill. App. 360 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Carter v. People
122 Ill. App. 77 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.E. 857, 207 Ill. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortune-v-gilbert-ill-1904.