Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford

558 So. 2d 542, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2159, 1990 WL 37507
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2117
StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 542 (Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford, 558 So. 2d 542, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2159, 1990 WL 37507 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellee filed a “Confession of Error.” We agree and reverse on the authority of International Bankers Ins. Co. v. Arnone, 552 So.2d 908 (Fla.1989). In Ar-none, the supreme court held that, based on their plain language, sections 627.736(1) and 627.739(2), Florida Statutes (1987), provide for “the authorized deductible amounts to be subtracted from the lesser of the eligible benefits after application of the coinsurance percentages of sections 627.736(l)(a) and (b) or the statutory mandated coverage limit of $10,000.” Id. at 911.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International Bankers Insurance Company v. Arnone
552 So. 2d 908 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 542, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2159, 1990 WL 37507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortune-insurance-co-v-sanford-fladistctapp-1990.