Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford

558 So. 2d 542, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2159, 1990 WL 37507
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1990·No. No. 89-2117·Published

Opinion

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellee filed a “Confession of Error.” We agree and reverse on the authority of International Bankers Ins. Co. v. Arnone, 552 So.2d 908 (Fla.1989). In Ar-none, the supreme court held that, based on their plain language, sections 627.736(1) and 627.739(2), Florida Statutes (1987), provide for “the authorized deductible amounts to be subtracted from the lesser of the eligible benefits after application of the coinsurance percentages of sections 627.736(l)(a) and (b) or the statutory mandated coverage limit of $10,000.” Id. at 911.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford, 558 So. 2d 542, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2159, 1990 WL 37507 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 542 (Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Bankers Insurance Company v. Arnone
552 So. 2d 908 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)