Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban
This text of 593 So. 2d 598 (Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiffs first attorney because (1) plaintiff’s insurance benefits were not wrongfully withheld, Ledesma v. Bankers Ins. Co., 573 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Obando v. Fortune Ins. Co., 563 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 627.736(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989), and (2) counsel stipulated that he would “retain a charging lien for services rendered and costs incurred on behalf of plaintiff. Said interest shall be satisfied from any court award made in the event the plaintiff prevails in this action.”
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 So. 2d 598, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1050, 1992 WL 21864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortune-insurance-co-v-iriban-fladistctapp-1992.