Fortuna v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.
This text of Fortuna v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc. (Fortuna v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wane eK ALEJANDRO FORTUNA, : Plaintiff, : : 22 Civ. 6892 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF : NEW YORK, INC., et al. : Defendants. :
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on October 7, 2022, the Court was informed that the parties have reached a settlement agreement in principle. It is hereby ORDERED that, by October 28, 2021, the parties shall submit: (7) the settlement agreement to the Court; and (i) a joint letter with supporting evidence addressing the findings this Court must make in order to approve the settlement as fair and reasonable. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 824 (2016); Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (outlining factors district courts have used to determine whether a proposed settlement is fair and reasonable). It is further ORDERED that all conferences and trial are CANCELED. Dated: October 7, 2022 New York, New York ) LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fortuna v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortuna-v-pepsi-cola-bottling-company-of-new-york-inc-nysd-2022.