Fortson v. State

79 S.E. 746, 13 Ga. App. 681, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 320
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 28, 1913·No. 5189·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1. A nolle prosequi may, without the consent of the accused, he entered at any time before the ease has been submitted to the jury. Penal Code, § 982. A case is not submitted to a jury, within the meanr ing of this section, until after the jury have been empaneled and sworn in the cause. Newsom v. State, 2 Ga. 60; Franklin v. State, 85 Ga. 570 (11 S. E. 876); Nolan v. State, 55 Ga. 521 (21 Am. R. 281).

2. It appearing, from the allegations of the special plea in bar in the present ease, that although the jury had been stricken and had taken their seats in the jury-box, they had not been sworn, the plea was [682] properly stricken on motion. Whether jeopardy begins immediately after the jury are sworn is not decided. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based solely upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Decided October 28, 1913. Accusation of carrying concealed weapon; from city court of Elberton — Judge Grogan. August' 23, 1913. P. P. Proffitt, for plaintiff in error. Boozer Payne, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortson v. State, 79 S.E. 746, 13 Ga. App. 681, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 320 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

79 S.E. 746 (Fortson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubbard v. State
483 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Alexander v. State
384 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
McIntyre v. State
377 S.E.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Newman v. State
305 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
State v. Wilwording
394 S.W.2d 383 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1965)
Martin v. State
37 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)