Fortson & Co. v. Mikell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fortson & Co. v. Mikell

22 S.E. 913, 97 Ga. 336

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 12, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 913 (Fortson & Co. v. Mikell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fortson & Co. v. Mikell, 22 S.E. 913, 97 Ga. 336 (Ga. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The evidence fully ' warranted the verdict;' and there being no express complaint that the substantial issues involved were not fairly submitted to the jury by the court in its charge, the mere omission to give a particular instruction, even if the same would have been appropriate, is not, in the absence of a special request to give such instruction, cause for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The evidence fully ' warranted the verdict;' and there being no express complaint that the substantial issues involved were not fairly submitted to the jury by the court in its charge, the mere omission to give a particular instruction, even if the same would have been appropriate, is not, in the absence of a special request to give such instruction, cause for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 S.E. 913, 97 Ga. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortson-co-v-mikell-ga-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack