Fortney v. Department of Highways

17 Ct. Cl. 204
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 3, 1989
DocketCC-88-157
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ct. Cl. 204 (Fortney v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fortney v. Department of Highways, 17 Ct. Cl. 204 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On January 19, 1988, claimant Warren E. Fortney was travelling on State Route 21, Marshall County, in the vicinity of Moundsville. His 1983 Chevette struck ice, left the road, and went over an embankment. The vehicle was a total loss. Claimants seek $8,000.00 for personal injuries, work loss and loss of the vehicle. It was brought to the attention of the Court by counsel for respondent that the vehicle in question was titled in both the names of Warren E. Fortney and Mary Ann Fortney. For that reason the Court amended the style of the claim to include Mary Ann Fortney as a party claimant.

Claimant Warren E. Fortney stated that on the morning of this incident he was travelling to work from Proctor, West Virginia. He travels this road everyday. He had observed ice at this location previously. He estimated his speed to be no more than twenty miles per hour. His vehicle turned around in the road and went over an embankment on the right side. It is a two-lane road with neither berm nor shoulder. Claimants had liability insurance only, and were not reimbursed for the damage to the vehicle. The book value of the 1983 Chevette was $2,250.00. Claimant Warren Fortney missed three weeks of work and incurred hospital bills, but he did not submit the bills to the Court. The hospital bills were covered by insurance. He stated that he did not have an out-of-pocket loss.

Kenneth Davidson, respondent Maintenance Supervisor for District 6, which includes Marshall County, testified regarding State Route 21. He stated that it is a State and local service route, and therefore is one of respondent lowest priority routes "... as far as maintenance and funding go."

Roads in this State, in the winter months, frequently accumulate frost. An isolated patch of ice on a highway is generally insufficient to establish negligence on the part of respondent. Cole vs. Dept. of Highways, 14 Ct.Cl. 350 (1983); Welch vs. Dept of Highways, CC-88-96 (Opinion issued December 29, 1988). It is well established that the State neither insures nor guarantees the safety of travelers on its highways. Adkins vs. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). For these reasons, the Court is of the opinion to, and does, disallow this claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Adkins v. Sims
46 S.E.2d 81 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1947)
Cole v. Department of Highways
14 Ct. Cl. 350 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ct. Cl. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortney-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1989.