Fortney v. Carter

203 F. 454, 121 C.C.A. 514, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1160
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 8, 1913·No. No. 1,112·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the questions involved in this appeal, and find ourselves forced to the conclusion that the assignments of error are without merit. The opinions filed by the learned trial judge properly applied the facts as found in the record 'to the law applicable thereto, and directed a decree with which we find no fault.

It follows that the decree complained of will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortney v. Carter, 203 F. 454, 121 C.C.A. 514, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1160 (4th Cir. 1913).

203 F. 454 (Fortney v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halpin v. Savannah River Electric Co.
41 F.2d 329 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Denney
24 F.2d 169 (Seventh Circuit, 1928)
Quinlivan v. Dail-Overland Co.
274 F. 56 (Sixth Circuit, 1921)
Davis v. Henry
266 F. 261 (Sixth Circuit, 1920)
Jennings v. United States
264 F. 399 (Eighth Circuit, 1920)
Dail-Overland Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.
263 F. 171 (N.D. Ohio, 1919)
Mahon v. Guaranty Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
239 F. 266 (Seventh Circuit, 1917)