Fortner v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fortner v. Division of Employment Security

391 S.W.3d 886, 2012 WL 6017954, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2012·No. No. WD 74954·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rick Fortner, appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s determination that he is an employer subject to Missouri Employment Security Law. On appeal, Mr. Fortner claims that the weight of the factors of the test determining whether a relationship between a boss and his or her workers is an employer/employee relationship or an independent contractor relationship showed that his laborers were independent contractors rather than employees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rick Fortner, appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s determination that he is an employer subject to Missouri Employment Security Law. On appeal, Mr. Fortner claims that the weight of the factors of the test determining whether a relationship between a boss and his or her workers is an employer/employee relationship or an independent contractor relationship showed that his laborers were independent contractors rather than employees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Fortner v. Division of Employment Security, 391 S.W.3d 886, 2012 WL 6017954, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 886 (Fortner v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.