Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT § SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC. § § No. 300, 2025 Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2024-0211 HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER § ANTOS, BRUCE ROBERTS, § JEFFREY T. JENKINS, SIDNEY C. § PETERSON III, CLIFFORD § SPAHN, JAMES R. COOK, JR., § TIMOTHY L. VANEGMOND, § ALAN HIBBARD, DAVID S. § HORN, DAVID T. MCLEAN, § DAVID W. KING, E. TODD § O’TUEL, GREGOY F. WEINGART, § GREGORY MCCLELLAND, JR., § JASON A. WEISER, JOHN C. § WEST, LEMUEL MAZA and § SEAN P. STILLEY, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: January 28, 2026 Decided: February 10, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.

ORDER

This 10th day of February, 2026, after consideration of the parties’ briefs, the

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated June 27, 2025.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice

1 Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, 341 A.3d 1027 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2025). 2