Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall

Supreme Court of Delaware

Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall

DecidedFebruary 10, 2026

Docket300, 2025

StatusPublished

This text of Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall (Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall, (Del. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT § SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC. § § No. 300, 2025 Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2024-0211 HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER § ANTOS, BRUCE ROBERTS, § JEFFREY T. JENKINS, SIDNEY C. § PETERSON III, CLIFFORD § SPAHN, JAMES R. COOK, JR., § TIMOTHY L. VANEGMOND, § ALAN HIBBARD, DAVID S. § HORN, DAVID T. MCLEAN, § DAVID W. KING, E. TODD § O’TUEL, GREGOY F. WEINGART, § GREGORY MCCLELLAND, JR., § JASON A. WEISER, JOHN C. § WEST, LEMUEL MAZA and § SEAN P. STILLEY, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: January 28, 2026 Decided: February 10, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.

ORDER

This 10th day of February, 2026, after consideration of the parties’ briefs, the

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated June 27, 2025.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice

1 Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, 341 A.3d 1027 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2025). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT § SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC. § § No. 300, 2025 Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2024-0211 HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER § ANTOS, BRUCE ROBERTS, § JEFFREY T. JENKINS, SIDNEY C. § PETERSON III, CLIFFORD § SPAHN, JAMES R. COOK, JR., § TIMOTHY L. VANEGMOND, § ALAN HIBBARD, DAVID S. § HORN, DAVID T. MCLEAN, § DAVID W. KING, E. TODD § O’TUEL, GREGOY F. WEINGART, § GREGORY MCCLELLAND, JR., § JASON A. WEISER, JOHN C. § WEST, LEMUEL MAZA and § SEAN P. STILLEY, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: January 28, 2026 Decided: February 10, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.

ORDER

This 10th day of February, 2026, after consideration of the parties’ briefs, the

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated June 27, 2025.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice

1 Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, 341 A.3d 1027 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2025). 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortiline-incet-al-v-hayne-mccall-del-2026.