Fortier v. Redi-Carpet Sales of Houston, LTD

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided July 15, 2020·No. 4:19-cv-00899·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 16, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION MICHEL FORTIER, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-899 § § REDI-CARPET SALES OF HOUSTON, § LTD, et al, § § Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 32) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on June 23, 2020 regarding Instrument 21. Plaintiff timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (5th Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. SIGNED on this the 1_5__th_ day July, 2020, at Houston, Texas. VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortier v. Redi-Carpet Sales of Houston, LTD, (S.D. Tex. 2020).

Fortier v. Redi-Carpet Sales of Houston, LTD (Fortier v. Redi-Carpet Sales of Houston, LTD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related