Fortenberry v. Hickory Flour & Feed Co.

200 N.C. 809
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 20, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.C. 809 (Fortenberry v. Hickory Flour & Feed Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fortenberry v. Hickory Flour & Feed Co., 200 N.C. 809 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that no error was committed by the trial court in nonsuiting the case. Scott v. Tel. Co., 198 N. C., 795, 153 S. E. 413.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
153 S.E. 413 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.C. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortenberry-v-hickory-flour-feed-co-nc-1931.