Fortenberry v. Board of Education

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fortenberry v. Board of Education

495 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 1105113

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102987

StatusPublished

This text of 495 S.W.3d 177 (Fortenberry v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fortenberry v. Board of Education, 495 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 1105113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Christelle E. Fortenberry appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the Board of Education of Hazelwood, on her racial discrimination lawsuit. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Christelle E. Fortenberry appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the Board of Education of Hazelwood, on her racial discrimination lawsuit. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

495 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 1105113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortenberry-v-board-of-education-moctapp-2016.