Forte v. Cohen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Forte v. Cohen

199 Ill. App. 462, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 265

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 12, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,110

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 Ill. App. 462 (Forte v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forte v. Cohen, 199 Ill. App. 462, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 265 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Brokers, § 85*—when evidence as to negotiations of with purchaser admissible. In an action by brokers against an owner of real estate for commissions for the sale thereof, the defendant may introduce evidence of negotiations by him with the purchaser in support of his defense that the sale was consummated through his efforts and not those of the plaintiffs. 2. Instruction, § 135*—when party may not complain that instructions not given. Where a party makes no request to the trial court therefor, he cannot complain on review that certain instructions were not given. 3. Instructions, § 126*—when properly refused as abstract. It is not error to refuse to give instructions stating abstract principles of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Brokers, § 85*—when evidence as to negotiations of with purchaser admissible. In an action by brokers against an owner of real estate for commissions for the sale thereof, the defendant may introduce evidence of negotiations by him with the purchaser in support of his defense that the sale was consummated through his efforts and not those of the plaintiffs. 2. Instruction, § 135*—when party may not complain that instructions not given. Where a party makes no request to the trial court therefor, he cannot complain on review that certain instructions were not given. 3. Instructions, § 126*—when properly refused as abstract. It is not error to refuse to give instructions stating abstract principles of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. App. 462, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forte-v-cohen-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack