Forte v. Board of Assessors

57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12158
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 915 (Forte v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forte v. Board of Assessors, 57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Submission of a controversy pursuant to CPLR 3222 to (1) invalidate defendant’s final assessment roll for the "1977 (76/77)” tax year and (2) direct defendant to complete a new final assessment roll for the said tax year at full value, or, if the court determines that it is not feasible to prepare a new final roll at full value for the 1977 (1976/1977) tax year, to direct defendant to prepare a final assessment roll at full value within a reasonable time, but not later than May 1, 1977 for the 1978 (1977/ 1978) tax year (as requested by plaintiffs), or by May 1, 1983 for the 1984 (1983/1984) tax year (as requested by defendant). Judgment is directed ordering defendant to prepare an assessment roll at full value for the 1981 (1980/1981) tax year by no later than May 1, 1980 (see Nassau County Administrative Code, § 6-9.0 [L 1939, chs 272, 701-709, as amd]). No costs are awarded. The revaluation of all real estate parcels in Nassau County, in accordance with the principles set forth in Matter of Hellerstein v Assessor of Town of Islip (37 NY2d 1) and 860 Executive Towers v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau (53 AD2d 463), is a monumental task. Nevertheless, and making due allowance for all of the factors referred to by defendant, a proper allocation, and temporary expansion, of its personnel should enable it to complete the task by May 1, 1980. Failure to do so shall be presumptive [916]*916proof that defendant was dilatory. Cohalan, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bauer v. Board of Assessment Review
91 A.D.2d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Slewett & Farber v. Board of Assessors
97 Misc. 2d 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Des Jardins v. Nieman
63 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forte-v-board-of-assessors-nyappdiv-1977.