Forte (Derrell) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 2020·No. 81116·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DERRELL WAYNE FORTE, No. 81116 Appellant,

vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. JUN 1 0 2020 EL1ZABE1 A. BROM CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY

DEPtgY-jst2

C A

MK.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from the "denial of rehearing on March 17, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal frorn an order denying a motion for rehearing, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

, J. ,J Hardesty Cadish

'The order entered on March 30, 2020, also denied a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea. However, that order was not designated in the notice of appeal. See NRAP 3(c)(1)(B) (providing that notice of appeal shall "designate the judgment, order or part thereof being appealed").

016 -,2/773

cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Derrell Wayne Forte Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 I947A arKgiEr.. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forte (Derrell) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Forte (Derrell) Vs. State (Forte (Derrell) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)