Fort Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati Railroad v. Gough
This text of 51 Ind. 600 (Fort Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati Railroad v. Gough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case and that of Paul v. The Connersville and Newcastle Junction R. R. Co., at this term, ante, p. 527, are admitted by counsel to be the same in all important legal respects as to the rights of the parties; the only difference between them being that in that case the defendant succeeded and had judgment in her favor, while in this case the plaintiff succeeded and had judgment in his favor. Roth cases depended on the same law and facts, but were decided. by different courts. That judgment was affirmed, and therefore the judgment in this case must be reyersed, which is done, at the costs of the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Ind. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-wayne-muncie-cincinnati-railroad-v-gough-ind-1875.