Fort v. State
902 So. 2d 842, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5210, 2005 WL 856980
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2005·No. No. 5D04-897·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Although we affirm this case on the authority of Atkins v. State, 785 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), and State v. Gibson, 783 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), we do so without prejudice to the appellant to seek relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Cf. State v. Clifton, 895 So.2d 513 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.11, 2005).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fort v. State, 902 So. 2d 842, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5210, 2005 WL 856980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
902 So. 2d 842 (Fort v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doyon v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
902 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)